- calculateCableSizing now selects cross-section against designCurrentA = max(operatingCurrentA, existingProtectionRatedCurrentA) instead of the load current alone. A breaker only trips at its own rated current (In), so a cable sized for the actual load could overheat under sustained current below that threshold - the standard In <= Iz rule. Voltage-drop calculation still uses the real operating current, only the capacity check changed. Alerts and the ok-summary now name the breaker as the limiting factor when it is one. - Added a manual cable type/cross-section entry in the modal itself: running a calculation pre-fills these fields as a suggestion, but they are the single field that actually gets applied, and stay editable - this restores the direct manual-entry capability the modal replaced when it took over the cableSummary/cableCrossSection cell click. - Fixed calculator icon position from a trailing ::after (inconsistent position depending on cell text length, easy to miss on empty cells) to a fixed-position ::before, so it is always in the same place regardless of whether cable data is already filled in. - No new display for the existing protection device - it already has its own Schutz column in this app.
150 lines
5.6 KiB
TypeScript
150 lines
5.6 KiB
TypeScript
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import { describe, it } from "node:test";
|
|
import {
|
|
buildCableSizingAlerts,
|
|
calculateCableSizing,
|
|
isCableSizingDataVerified,
|
|
type CableSizingInput,
|
|
} from "../src/cable-sizing/domain/cable-sizing-calculation.js";
|
|
|
|
const BASE_INPUT: CableSizingInput = {
|
|
phase: 1,
|
|
mode: "power",
|
|
powerKw: 5,
|
|
cosPhi: 1,
|
|
voltage: 230,
|
|
lengthM: 30,
|
|
layingMethod: "C",
|
|
conductorMaterial: "copper",
|
|
insulation: "pvc",
|
|
ambientTemperatureC: 30,
|
|
groupingCircuits: 1,
|
|
maxVoltageDropPercent: 3,
|
|
harmonicNeutralLoad: "none",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
describe("calculateCableSizing", () => {
|
|
it("matches the verified reference case (1~, 5 kW, 230 V, 30 m, method C, copper)", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateCableSizing(BASE_INPUT);
|
|
assert.equal(result.dataVerified, true);
|
|
assert.ok(Math.abs(result.operatingCurrentA - 21.739) < 0.01);
|
|
assert.equal(result.crossSectionByCapacityMm2, 2.5);
|
|
assert.equal(result.crossSectionByVoltageDropMm2, 4);
|
|
assert.equal(result.recommendedCrossSectionMm2, 4);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns dataVerified: false and no numeric result for an unverified laying method", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateCableSizing({ ...BASE_INPUT, layingMethod: "A2" });
|
|
assert.equal(result.dataVerified, false);
|
|
assert.equal(result.recommendedCrossSectionMm2, null);
|
|
assert.equal(result.rows.length, 0);
|
|
// The operating current itself does not depend on the capacity table
|
|
// and is still reported so the UI can show at least that much.
|
|
assert.ok(Math.abs(result.operatingCurrentA - 21.739) < 0.01);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns dataVerified: false for xlpe regardless of method", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateCableSizing({ ...BASE_INPUT, insulation: "xlpe" });
|
|
assert.equal(result.dataVerified, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("isCableSizingDataVerified matches the six ported, verified methods only", () => {
|
|
for (const method of ["A1", "B2", "C", "E", "D1", "D2"] as const) {
|
|
assert.equal(isCableSizingDataVerified(method, "pvc"), true, method);
|
|
}
|
|
for (const method of ["A2", "B1", "F", "G"] as const) {
|
|
assert.equal(isCableSizingDataVerified(method, "pvc"), false, method);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("applies the 0.86 harmonic reduction factor only for three-phase + 15to33Percent", () => {
|
|
const threePhase: CableSizingInput = {
|
|
...BASE_INPUT,
|
|
phase: 3,
|
|
mode: "current",
|
|
currentA: 10,
|
|
powerKw: undefined,
|
|
voltage: 400,
|
|
};
|
|
const base = calculateCableSizing({ ...threePhase, harmonicNeutralLoad: "none" });
|
|
const derated = calculateCableSizing({
|
|
...threePhase,
|
|
harmonicNeutralLoad: "15to33Percent",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(base.harmonicReductionApplied, false);
|
|
assert.equal(derated.harmonicReductionApplied, true);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
Math.abs(derated.combinedDerationFactor - base.combinedDerationFactor * 0.86) < 1e-9
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const singlePhaseWithHarmonics = calculateCableSizing({
|
|
...BASE_INPUT,
|
|
harmonicNeutralLoad: "15to33Percent",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(singlePhaseWithHarmonics.harmonicReductionApplied, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses max(operatingCurrentA, existingProtectionRatedCurrentA) as the design current for cross-section selection", () => {
|
|
// Load alone (21.7 A) would recommend 4 mm² (see the reference case
|
|
// above); a 32 A breaker on the same circuit must still be covered by
|
|
// the cable (In <= Iz), so the recommendation should grow accordingly.
|
|
const withoutBreaker = calculateCableSizing(BASE_INPUT);
|
|
const withBreaker = calculateCableSizing({
|
|
...BASE_INPUT,
|
|
existingProtectionRatedCurrentA: 32,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(withoutBreaker.designCurrentA, withoutBreaker.operatingCurrentA);
|
|
assert.equal(withBreaker.designCurrentA, 32);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
(withBreaker.recommendedCrossSectionMm2 ?? 0) >=
|
|
(withoutBreaker.recommendedCrossSectionMm2 ?? 0)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(withBreaker.protectionCoordination?.coordinated);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("reports an oversized breaker as the limiting factor when no cross-section can cover it", () => {
|
|
const result = calculateCableSizing({
|
|
...BASE_INPUT,
|
|
existingProtectionRatedCurrentA: 1000,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(result.designCurrentA, 1000);
|
|
assert.equal(result.recommendedCrossSectionMm2, null);
|
|
// No cross-section satisfies the design current at all, so there is no
|
|
// "recommended but under-protected" case to flag - protectionCoordination
|
|
// is only meaningful once a recommendation exists.
|
|
assert.equal(result.protectionCoordination, null);
|
|
|
|
const alerts = buildCableSizingAlerts(
|
|
{ ...BASE_INPUT, existingProtectionRatedCurrentA: 1000 },
|
|
result
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(alerts.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(alerts[0].kind, "critical");
|
|
assert.ok(alerts[0].text.includes("Vorhandene Sicherung"));
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("buildCableSizingAlerts", () => {
|
|
it("returns a single critical alert for an unverified combination, no numeric claims", () => {
|
|
const input: CableSizingInput = { ...BASE_INPUT, layingMethod: "G" };
|
|
const result = calculateCableSizing(input);
|
|
const alerts = buildCableSizingAlerts(input, result);
|
|
assert.equal(alerts.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(alerts[0].kind, "critical");
|
|
assert.ok(alerts[0].text.includes("keine geprüften"));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns a single ok alert for a clean, unremarkable case", () => {
|
|
const input: CableSizingInput = {
|
|
...BASE_INPUT,
|
|
mode: "current",
|
|
currentA: 15,
|
|
powerKw: undefined,
|
|
lengthM: 3,
|
|
};
|
|
const result = calculateCableSizing(input);
|
|
const alerts = buildCableSizingAlerts(input, result);
|
|
assert.equal(alerts.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(alerts[0].kind, "ok");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|